[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Vibration Testing and System Dynamics
ISSN: 2475-4811 (print)
ISSN: 2475-482X (online)
Journal of Vibration Testing and System Dynamics

C. Steve Suh (editor), Pawel Olejnik (editor),

Xianguo Tuo (editor)

Pawel Olejnik (editor)

Lodz University of Technology, Poland

Email: pawel.olejnik@p.lodz.pl

C. Steve Suh (editor)

Texas A&M University, USA

Email: ssuh@tamu.edu

Xiangguo Tuo (editor)

Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, China

Email: tuoxianguo@suse.edu.cn

Numerical Analysis of Fluid-Structure Interaction of Fire Doors in Cross-Passages of Subway Tunnels

Journal of Vibration Testing and System Dynamics 5(1) (2021) 19--32 | DOI:10.5890/JVTSD.2021.03.002

Yong-hang Sun$^{1}$, Zhong Luo$^{1, 2, 3 }$ , Kai Wei$^{1}$, Yu Wang$^{1}$, Gui-xin Han$^{1}$

$^{1}$ School of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, PR China

$^{2}$ Key Laboratory of Vibration and Control of Aero-Propulsion System Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, PR China

$^{3}$ State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

This study is concerned with the dynamic response of fire doors in cross-passages of subway tunnels. Fire doors in cross-passages of subway tunnels are prone to failure due to the piston effect. First, a full-size model of a section of tunnel in Shenyang Metro was established. Then, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to simulate unsteady airflow under different train speeds. Pressure on the surface of the fire door was obtained and the pressure was set as the excitation on the finite element model of the fire door. Finally, the structural response of the fire door was obtained through explicit dynamics analysis. Maximum stress on the fire door structure was found to be 10.05 MPa. Consistent results were obtained with the actual failure warping deformation, it can be considered that the piston wind is the main factor leading to the warping deformation of the fire door. The findings provide guidance for the installation and maintenance of fire doors in metro tunnels.

References

  1. [1]  Zhang, H., Zhu, C., Liu, M., Zheng, W., You, S., Li, B., and Xue, P. (2017), Mathematical modeling and sensitive analysis of the train-induced unsteady airflow in subway tunnel, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 171, 67-78.
  2. [2]  Kim, J.Y. and Kim, K.Y. (2007), Experimental and numerical analyses of train-induced unsteady tunnel flow in subway, Tunnelling {$\&$ Underground Space Technology}, 22(2), 166-172.
  3. [3]  Han, G., Luo, Z., Sun, Y., and Li, C. (2019), Time-variant characteristic under the piston wind on subway tunnel billboard, Proceedings of the iMeche, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 233(16), 5637-5646.
  4. [4]  Xue, P., You, S., Chao, J., and Ye, T. (2014), Numerical investigation of unsteady airflow in subway influenced by piston effect based on dynamic mesh, Tunnelling $&$ Underground Space Technology, 40, 174-181.
  5. [5]  Gonzalez, L.M., Vega, M.G., Oro, J.M.F., and Marigorta, E.B. (2014), Numerical modeling of the piston effect in longitudinal ventilation systems for subway tunnels, Tunnelling $&$ Underground Space Technology, 40(2), 22-37.
  6. [6]  Camelli, F.E., Byrne, G., and L\"{o}hner, R. (2014), Modeling subway air flow using CFD, Tunnelling $&$ Underground Space Technology, 43 (7), 20-31.
  7. [7]  Yang, L., Zhang, Y., and Xia, J. (2018), Case study of train-induced airflow inside underground subway stations with simplified field test methods, Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 275-287.
  8. [8]  Moro, L., Boscariol, P., Bona, F.D., Gasparetto, A., and Novak, J.S. (2017), Innovative design of fire doors: computational modeling and experimental validation, Fire Technology, 53(5), 1833-1846.
  9. [9]  Zhang, W. and Qian, J. (2017), Safety Performance of a special airtight anti-fire door for nuclear power station subjected to windborne debris impact, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 36(5), 221-226.
  10. [10]  Salomoni, V.A., Mazzucco, G., Xotta, G., Fincato, R., Majorana, C.E., and Schiavon, M. (2013), Nonlinear modelling, design, and test of steel blast-resistant doors, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 908373.
  11. [11]  Wang, M. (2013), Discussion on design of fire door of underground connection passage, Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 30(4), 116-119.
  12. [12]  Xing, J. (2016), Developments of numerical methods for linear and nonlinear fluid-solid interaction dynamics with applications, Mechanics in Engineering, 46(201602), 1-45.
  13. [13]  G\"{u}c\"{u}yen, E. (2017), Analysis of offshore wind turbine tower under environmental loads, Ships and Offshore Structures, 12(4), 513-520.
  14. [14]  Wang, Y., Ren, W., He, J., Ye, C., and Chang, Q. (2016), Analysis of aerodynamic loading properties on hood of high-speed railway tunnel, Perspectives in Science, 7, 323-328.
  15. [15]  Huang, S., Xu, Y., Zhang, L., and Zhu, W. (2018), A data exchange algorithm for one way fluid-structure interaction analysis and its application on high-speed train coupling interface, Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 11(2), 519-526.
  16. [16]  Mandara, A., Russo, E., Faggiano, B., and Mazzolani, F.M. (2016), Analysis of fluid-structure interaction for a submerged floating tunnel, 2nd International Symposium on Submerged Floating Tunnels and Underwater Tunnel Structures, 166, 397-404.
  17. [17]  Capote, J.A., Alvear, D., Abreu, O., Lazaro, M., Boffill, Y., Manzanares, A., and Maamar, M. (2013), Assessment of physical phenomena associated to fire doors during standard tests, Fire Technology, 49(2), 357-378.
  18. [18]  Keller, W.J. and Pessiki, S. (2015), Effect of earthquake-induced damage on the sidesway response of steel moment-frame buildings during fire exposure, Earthquake Spectra, 31(1), 273-292.
  19. [19]  Gao, W., Chen, J., Cui, M., and Cheng, Y. (2005), Dynamic response analysis of linear stochastic truss structures under stationary random excitation, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 281(1-2), 311-321.
  20. [20]  Li, Y., Mulani, S.B., Kapania, R.K., Fei, Q., and Wu, S. (2017), Non-stationary random vibration analysis of structures under multiple correlated normal random excitations, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 400, 481-507.
  21. [21]  Yan, K., Cheng, G., and Wang, B. (2018), Topology optimization of damping layers in shell structures subject to impact loads for minimum residual vibration, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 431, 226-247.
  22. [22]  Bazilevs, Y., Takizawa, K., and Tezduyar, T.E. (2013), Challenges and directions in computational fluid--structure interaction, Mathematical Models $&$ Methods in Applied Sciences, 23(02), 215-221.
  23. [23]  Ye, Z., Zhang, W., and Shi, A. (2016), Fundamentals of Fluid-Structure Coupling and Its Application, Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Harbin.
  24. [24]  ANSYS Ins (2017), ANSYS FLUENT users guide, Canonsburg.
  25. [25]  Dassault Syst\`{e}mes (2017), ABAQUS CAE, V\{e}lizy Villacoublay Cedex.
  26. [26]  Anderson, J., Dick, E., Degrez, G., Grundmann, R., Degroote, J., and Vierendeels, J. (2009), Computational Fluid Dynamics: An Introduction, Springer.
  27. [27]  National Standard of the Peoples Republic of China: Code for Metro Design (2013), GB50157-2013, China Building Industry Press, Beijing.
  28. [28]  Fluent Incorporation (2000), Gambit tutorial guide release 2.4.6.

Copyright © 2011-2024 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates