[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics
ISSN:2325-6192 (print)
ISSN:2325-6206 (online)
Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management
António Mendes Lopes (editor), Jiazhong Zhang(editor)
António Mendes Lopes (editor)

University of Porto, Portugal

Email: aml@fe.up.pt

Jiazhong Zhang (editor)

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710049, China

Fax: +86 29 82668723 Email: jzzhang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

An Indicator-based Approach to Measure Urban Sustainability in India

Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 7(2) (2019) 155--184 | DOI:10.5890/JEAM.2019.06.004

B. Sudhakara Reddy, Arpit Tiwari

Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India and Research Fellow, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

This study provides a snapshot of the sustainability of selected Indian cities by employing 57 indicators in four dimensions to develop an overall city sustainability index. In recent years, ‘urban sustainability’ has become a prominent concept due to its complexity. Urban areas propel growth and at the same time pose a number of ecological, social and infrastructural problems and risks. High population density and continuous immigration among developing countries produced the highest risk in natural and manmade disasters. These issues and the inability of policy-makers in providing basic services make the cities unsustainable. The objective of the paper is to develop a city sustainability index (CSI) to measure and evaluate the urban regions in terms of sustainable performance. A benchmark approach is used to measure the cumulative performance of the 25 largest Indian cities based on economic, environmental, social and institutional dimensions. The CSI, consisting of four dimensions disaggregates into 14 categories and ultimately into 57 indicators. The data are obtained from public and non-governmental organizations, as also from city officials and experts. The results show that five of India’s largest cities-Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Chennai and Mumbai-take the lead in sustainability. India’s largest financial center, Mumbai, ranks relatively low in social and environmental dimensions due to inadequate infrastructure, losing out to a new entrant, Hyderabad. Kolkata’s score is harmed by relatively poor infrastructure and low per-capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP). By ranking a sample of diverse cities on a set of specific dimensions the study can serve as a baseline of current conditions and a marker for referencing future results. The benchmarks and indices presented in the study provide a unique resource for the government and the city authorities to learn about the positive and negative attributes of the city and prepare plans for sustainable urban development.

References

  1. [1]  Alshuwaikhat, H.M. and Nkwenti, D. (2002), Developing Sustainable Cities in Arid Regions, Cities 19(2), 85-94.
  2. [2]  Anon (2016), The world cities in 2016, Economic and social Affairs Division, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
  3. [3]  Beaver, M.A. and Patterson, J. (Eds.) (1992), A Select, Annotated Bibliography on Sustainable Cities, Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg, Canada.
  4. [4]  Annual survey of India's city systems (2013), Transforming cities and citizenship, Janaagraha Centre for Citizenship and Democracy, Bangalore.
  5. [5]  Anon (2015), Defining and measuring urban sustainability: a review of indicators. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276621753 Defining and measuring urban sustainability a review of indicators [accessed Dec 7, 2015].
  6. [6]  Anon (2010), Slums in million plus cities. Available at http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/44850/16/16 chapter%207.pdf. Accessed on 2nd May, 2016
  7. [7]  Anon, 2011, Distribution and Growth of Population in Million Cities. Available at http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/44850/11/11 chapter%202.pdf. Accessed on 15th May, 2016
  8. [8]  Brandon, P.S. and Lombardi, P. (2005), Evaluating sustainable development, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  9. [9]  Briassoulis, H. (2001), Sustainable development and its indicators: through a (planner's) glass darkly, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44(3), 409-427.
  10. [10]  BRSIPP (2011), Program and Results, http://www.nimhans.kar.nic.in/epidemiology/bisp/brsipp2011c.pdf.
  11. [11]  Bulkeley, H. (2006), Urban sustainability: Learning from best practice, Environment and Planning 38(2), 1029-C1044.
  12. [12]  Chaudhuri, S. and Gupta, N. (2009), Levels of living and poverty patterns: a district-wise analysis for India, Economic and Political Weekly 14(9), 1124-1145
  13. [13]  Dluhy, M. and Swartz, N. (2006), Connecting knowledge and policy: the promise of community indicators in the United States, Social Indicators Research 79(2), 1-23.
  14. [14]  Fekri, Y.S. (2014), Performance assessment of steel industry. International Journal of Sustainable Human Development, 2(1), 8-17.
  15. [15]  Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., and Golubiewski, N.E. (2008), Global change and the ecology of cities, Science, 319(5864), 756-76.
  16. [16]  Govindarajulu, D. (2014), Urban green space planning for climate adaptation in Indian cities, Urban Climate, October 2014. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268690352. Accessed on 15th May 2016
  17. [17]  Hoornweg, D., Nuñez, R, Freire, M., Palugyai, N., Villaveces, M., and Herrera, W. (2006), City Indicators: Now to Nanjing, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
  18. [18]  Hardoy, J.E., Mitlin, D., and Satterhwaite, D. (2001), Environmental Problems in an Urbanizing World: Finding Solutions for Cities in Africa, Asia and Latin America, Earthscan, London.
  19. [19]  Jakub, R. (2013), Urban Benchmarking as a tool for complex assessment of development potential, European Union.
  20. [20]  Jordi, G.A., Clara dos, S.D., Anselmo, M., and Ricardo, A. (2014), Assessing the performance of urban water utilities in Mozambique using a water utility performance index. Available at http://www.wrc.org.za.
  21. [21]  Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1976), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Trade-offs, Wiley, New York.
  22. [22]  Kötter, T. and Friesecke, F. (2011), Developing urban indicators for managing mega cities, Department of Urban Planning and Real Estate Management, Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
  23. [23]  Kundu, A. (2011), Trends and processes of urbanisation in India, Report submitted to International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York
  24. [24]  Kumar, P. (2012), Role of Non-motorized Transport in Million plus Cities, Ministry of Urban Development, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
  25. [25]  Leff, S. and Petersen, B. (2015), Beyond the Scorecard: Understanding Global City Rankings, Report prepared by The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Chicago. Legrand, N., Planche, S., and Rabia, F. (2007), Integration d'Indicateurs de Developpement Durable dans un Outil d'Aide a la Decision, Paris.
  26. [26]  Li, F., Liu, X.S., Hu, D.,Wang, R.S., Yang,W.R., Li, D., and Zhao, D. (2009),Measurement Indicators and An Evaluation Approach for Assessing Urban Sustainable Development: A Case Study for China's Jinxing City, Landscape and.Urban Plan 90(2), 134-C142.
  27. [27]  Mavrič J. and Bobek, V. (2015), Measuring Urban Development and City Performance. Available at http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5772/61063. Accessed on 18th May, 2016.
  28. [28]  Michael, F.L., Noor, Z.Z., Zardari, N.H., and Meza. M.J. (2013), Analytical hierarchy process application in urban sustainability indicators prior itization, Resources and Environment 3(5A) 1-5.
  29. [29]  McGranahan, G.P., Marcotullio, J., and Bai, X. (2005), "Urban systems", in Rashid Hassan, Robert Scholes and Neville Ash (editors), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current Status and Trends, Island Press, Washington D.C, pp. 795- 825.
  30. [30]  Maclaren, V. (1996), Developing Indicators of Urban Sustainability A Focus on the Canadian Experience, ICURR, Toronto.
  31. [31]  Michael, F.L, Noor, Z.Z., Zardari, N.H., and Meza, M.J.F. (2013), Analytical hierarchy process application in urban sustainability indicators prioritization, Resources and Environment, 3(A), 1-5
  32. [32]  National Sample Survey Organisation (2012), National Sample results, Employment and Unemployment Survey: 68th round, July 2011 - June 2012, New Delhi.
  33. [33]  Prescott-Alien, R. (2001), The well-being of Nations, Island press, London.
  34. [34]  Christian, K. (2011), Sustainable Development Goals: Are the rich countries ready? Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  35. [35]  Schlossberg, M. and Zimmerman, A. (2003), Developing State-wide Indices of environmental, economic, and social sustainability: A look at Oregon and the Oregon benchmarks, Local Environment, 8(6), 641-660.
  36. [36]  Seabrooke, W., Yeung, S.C.W., Ma, F.M.F. and Li, Y. (2004), Implementing sustainable urban development at the operational level (with special reference to Hong Kong and Guangzhou), Habitat International 28(5), 443-466.
  37. [37]  Shen, L.Y., Ochoa, J.J., Shah, M.N., and Zhang, X.L. (2011), The application of urban sustainability indicators-a comparison between various practices, Habitat International, 35(3), 17-29.
  38. [38]  Siche, J. R., Agostinho, F., Rotega, E., and Romeiro, A. (2008), Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices, Ecological Economics, 66(4), 628-637.
  39. [39]  Sirgy, M. J. (2011), Theoretical Perspectives Guiding QOL Indicator Projects, Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 1-22.
  40. [40]  Sreekumar, N. and Josey, A. (2012), Electricity in Mega cities, Working Paper, Prayas Energy Group, Pune, India.
  41. [41]  Sudhakara, R.B. and Balachandra, P. (2013), Benchmarking Indian megacities for sustainability - Anindicator-based approach, Final Report submitted to South Asia Network of Economic research Institutes (SANEI).
  42. [42]  Sumner, A. (2004), Economic well-being and non-economic well-being: A review of the meaning and measurement of poverty, Research paper no 2004/3,World Institute of Development Research
  43. [43]  Thomas, E. (2013), Urban Sustainability and Resilience - Why We Need to Focus on Scales, Stockholm.
  44. [44]  UNHABITAT (2012), State of the World's Cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of Cities, Available at http://www.unhabitat.org/ pmss/getElectronicVersion.aspx?nr=3387&alt=1.
  45. [45]  UNHABITAT (2009), Global Urban Indicators - Selected statistics, UN-HABITAT, Available at http://www.unhabitat.org/ downloads/docs/global urban indicators.pdf.
  46. [46]  World Bank (2008), Exploring Urban Growth Management: Insights from Three Cities, Urban Paper Series. UP-7, Urban Development Unit, France.
  47. [47]  UNDESA/PD (2012), World Urbanisation Prospects: The 2011 Revision, New York: United Nations.
  48. [48]  Wei, Y., Huang, C., Patrick, T., Lam, I., Sha, Y. and Feng, Y. (2015), Using Urban-Carrying Capacity as a Benchmark for Sustainable Urban Development: An Empirical Study of Beijing, Sustainability 7(7), 3244-3268.
  49. [49]  UN, 2015, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities.
  50. [50]  http://knoema.com/atlas/India/Bhopal;
  51. [51]  http://www.devinfo.org/indiacensus2011/libraries/aspx/home.aspx;
  52. [52]  http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/country result.jsp?country=India;
  53. [53]  http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Tables Published/Basic Data Sheet.aspx;
  54. [54]  http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hlo/hlo highlights.html;
  55. [55]  http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/HLO/HL PCA/Houselisting-housing; HLPCA.html?drpQuick=&drpQuickSelect=&q=bhopal;
  56. [56]  http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/population enumeration.html;
  57. [57]  http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hh-series/hh01.html;
  58. [58]  http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hlo/Slum table/Slum table.html;
  59. [59]  http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/hh-series/hh01.html;
  60. [60]  http://www.census2011.co.in/;
  61. [61]  http://ncrb.nic.in/;
  62. [62]  https://data.gov.in/search/site/gdp+of+cities;
  63. [63]  https://data.gov.in/catalog/district-wise-gdp-and-growth-rate-current-price2004-05;
  64. [64]  https://data.gov.in/catalog/district-wise-gdp-and-growth-rate-constant-price2004-05;
  65. [65]  https://data.gov.in/catalog/district-wise-capita-income-current-prices;
  66. [66]  http://www.numbeo.com/pollution/city result.jsp? country=India&city=Bhopal;
  67. [67]  http://pibmumbai.gov.in/scripts/detail.asp?releaseId=E2011IS3;
  68. [68]  http://www.census2011.co.in/census/city/365-mumbai.html;
  69. [69]  http://dcmsme.gov.in/dips/old dipr.html;
  70. [70]  http://www.mudraa.com/trading/52752/0/key-metros-with-high-per-capita-income.html.

Copyright © 2011-2024 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates