[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics
ISSN:2325-6192 (print)
ISSN:2325-6206 (online)
Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management
António Mendes Lopes (editor), Jiazhong Zhang(editor)
António Mendes Lopes (editor)

University of Porto, Portugal

Email: aml@fe.up.pt

Jiazhong Zhang (editor)

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710049, China

Fax: +86 29 82668723 Email: jzzhang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: The Case of the Abisko National Park (Sweden)

Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 3(4) (2015) 355--369 | DOI:10.5890/JEAM.2015.11.005

Natasha Nikodinoska$^{1}$, Alessandro Paletto$^{2}$, Pier Paolo Franzese$^{1}$, Christer Jonasson$^{3}$

$^{1}$ Laboratory of Ecodynamics and Sustainable Development, Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, Italy

$^{2}$ Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Forest Monitoring and Planning Research Unit, Trento, Italy

$^{3}$ Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

Sub-Artic ecosystems have evolved and adapted to extreme environmental condition. Yet, these ecosystems are vulnerable to local and global impacts due to human activities and climate change. In addition, a controversial debate over land use in the Swedish Lapland is still open, involving different stakeholders’ interests and activities. The Abisko National Park (Swedish sub-Arctic Lapland) is one of the Europe’s largest remaining wilderness areas and an important tourist attraction. In this study, an economic valuation of the main ecosystem services (ES) was performed by using the Contingent Valuation (CV) method. The categories of ES generated in the Park were identified and tourists were chosen as main stakeholders in the area. Tourists were then interviewed about their perception on ES and their willingness to pay (WTP) for supporting conservation activities capable of preserving the functionality of the Park to provide different goods and services. Results show that 61% of the respondents were willing to pay for the implementation of adaptation strategies coping with climate change impact. The mean individual WTP were found to be 6.20 € for the provisioning services, 5.69 € for the regulating services, 6.35 € for supporting services, 4.09 € for cultural services, while the total mean WTP per tourist was found to be 22.33 €. In addition, statistically significant correlations between tourists’ perceptions and individual WTP for three ES categories were found. These outcomes could support local decision makers in charge for the implementation of climate change adaptation strategies in the Park. However, it is important to remark that for a more comprehensive assessment of ecosystem services and their role in support of human well-being, the economic valuation should be integrated by a solid biophysical accounting.

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from INTERACT (grant agreement No. 262693) under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme. This research was part of a project titled “Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services in Swedish Lappland” (MAVES) funded by INTERACT Transnational Access Program. The authors wish to thank the Abisko Scientific Research Station for the logistics support during the visit.

References

  1. [1]  Adams, C., da Motta, S.R., Ortiz, R.A., Reid, J., Aznar, C.E. and de Almeida Sinisgalli, P.A. (2008), The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, S?o Paulo State (Brazil), Ecological Economics 66, 359-370.
  2. [2]  Alberini, A., and Kahn, J.R. (2006), Handbook on contingent valuation, Edward Elgar Publishing: London. 426 pages.
  3. [3]  Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R. and Schuman, H. (1993), Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, Register 58, 4602-4614. Retrieved on 20/12/2013 from http://www.cbe.csueastbay.edu/~alima/courses/4306/articles/NOAA%20on%20contingent%20valuation%201993.pdf.
  4. [4]  Asciuto, A., Fiandaca, F. and Schimmenti E. (2005), Comparison between Willingness-to-Pay expressed by a panel of forestry experts and by a sample of non-expert respondents in a pilot survey conducted for a Contingent Valuation study, New Medit (A Mediterranean Journal of Economics, Agriculture and Environment). 1, 42-51.
  5. [5]  BalticSTERN (2013), The Baltic Sea - Our Common Treasure Economics of Saving the Sea. Rapport 2013:4. Retrieved on 31/01/2014 from http://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.4531be2013cd58e8448550/BalticSTERN_The+Baltic+Sea+- +Our+Common+Treasure.+Economics+of+Saving+the+Sea_0314.pdf.
  6. [6]  Baral, N., Stern, M.J. and Bhattarai, R. (2008), Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: Implications for sustainable park finance and local development, Ecological Economics 66, 218-227.
  7. [7]  Berghöfer, A. and Dudley, N. (2010), Ecosystem services and protected areas. In TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). TEEB for Local and Regional Policy Makers.
  8. [8]  Bergstrom, J.C., Stoll, J.R. and Randall, A. (1990). The impact of information on environmental commodity valuation decisions, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 27, 614-621.
  9. [9]  Blamey, R.K., Bennet, J.W. and Morrison, M.D. (1999), Yeah - saying in contingent valuation surveys, Land Economics 75(1), 126- 141.
  10. [10]  Boman, M. and Mattsson, L. (2008), A note on attitudes and knowledge concerning environmental issues in Sweden, Journal of Environmental Management 86(3), 575-579.
  11. [11]  Bostedt, G. and Mattsson, L. (1995), The value of forest for tourism in Sweden, Annals of Tourists Research, 22 (3), 671-680.
  12. [12]  Bowman, T., Thompson, J. and Colletti, J. (2009), Valuation of open space and conservation features in residential subdivisions, Journal of Environmental Management 90, 321-330.
  13. [13]  Boyd, J. and Banzhaf, S. (2007), What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63(2-3) 616-626.
  14. [14]  Broberg, T. (2007), Assessing the Non-Timber Value of Old-Growth Forest in Sweden, Umeä Economic Studies. vol. 712: Department of Economics, Umeå University.
  15. [15]  Callaghan, T.V., Jonasson, C., Thierfelder, T., Yang, Z., Hedenås, H., Johansson, M. and Sloan, L.V. (2013), Ecosystem change and stability over multiple decades in the Swedish subarctic: complex processes and multiple drivers, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 368, 1-18.
  16. [16]  Castro, A.J., Martín-López, B., García-LLorente, M., Aguilera, P.A., López, E. and Cabello, J. (2011), Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region, Journal of Arid Environments, 75, 1201-1208.
  17. [17]  Chan, K.M.A., Shaw, M.R., Cameron, D.R., Underwood, E.C. and Daily, G.C. (2006), Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology 4, e379.
  18. [18]  DeFries, R., Hansen, A., Turner, B.L., Reid, R. and Liu J. (2007), Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function, Ecological Applications 17, 1031-1038.
  19. [19]  Dumitras, D.E., Arian, F.H. and Merce, E. (2011), A Brief Economic Assessment on the Valuation of National and Natural parks: the Case of Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 39, 134-138.
  20. [20]  Emanuelsson, U. (1987), Human influence on vegetation in the Tornetr?sk area during the last three centuries, Ecological Bulletin 38, 95-111.
  21. [21]  Emerton, L., Bishop, J. and Thomas, L. (2006), Sustainable Financing of Protected Areas: A global review of challenges and options, IUCN: Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. x + 97 pages.
  22. [22]  Figueroa, B.E. and Aronson, J. (2006), New linkages for protected areas: Making them worth conserving and restoring, Journal for Nature Conservation 14(3), 225-232.
  23. [23]  Franzese, P.P., Russo, G.F. and Ulgiati, S. (2008), Modeling the interplay of environment, economy and resources in marine protected areas: A case study in southern Italy, Ecological Questions 10, 91-97.
  24. [24]  Furberg, M., Evengard, B. and Nilsson, M. (2011), Facing the limit of resilience: perceptions of climate change among reindeer herding Sami in Sweden, Global Health Action 4, 8268-8275.
  25. [25]  Fredman, P. (2004), National Park Designation- Visitor Flows and Tourism Impact, In Sievänen T, Erkkonen J., Jokimäki J., Saarinen J., Tuulentie S. and Virtanen E., (eds.). Proceedings of The Second International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected areas, Finnish Forest Research Institute: Rovaniemi, Finland.
  26. [26]  Fisher, B. and Turner, R.K. (2008), Ecosystem services: classification for valuation, Biological Conservation 141(5),1167-1169.
  27. [27]  Füzyová, L', Lániková, D. and Novorolsky, M. (2009), Economic valuation of Tatras National Park and regional environmental policy, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 18, 811-818.
  28. [28]  Gordon, J.E., Dvorák, I.J., Jonasson, C., Josefsson, M., Kociánová, M. and Thompson, D.B.A. (2002), Geo-ecology and management of sensitive montane landscapes, Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography 84, 193-203.
  29. [29]  Grilli, G., De Meo, I. and Paletto, A. (2014), Economic Value of Recreation in European Mountain Forests: A Meta-Analysis. Baltic Forestry 20(1), 167-175.
  30. [30]  Hackl, F. and Pruckner, G.J. (1995), Der Wert der Natur - Eine ökonomische Bewertung des Nationalparks Kalkalpen. (The value of nature - an economic valuation of the national park 'Kalkalpen'), Wirtschaftspolitische Bl?tter 6(95), 506-514.
  31. [31]  Halstead, J.M., Luloff, A.E. and Stevens, T.H. (1992), Protest bidders in contingent valuation, Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(2), 160-169.
  32. [32]  Halstead, J.M., Lindsay, B.E. and Brown, C.M. (1991), Use of Tobit model in contingent valuation: experimental evidence from the Pemigewasset Wilderness Areas, Journal of Environmental Management 33, 79-89.
  33. [33]  Heberlein, T.A., Fredman, P. and Vuorio T. (2002), Current Tourism Patterns in the Swedish Mountain Region, Mountain Research and Development 22,142-149.
  34. [34]  Häyhä, T. and Franzese, P.P. (2014), Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecological Modelling 289, 124-132.
  35. [35]  Häyhä, T., Franzese, P.P., Paletto, A. and Fath, B.D. (2015), Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosystem Services 14, 12-23.
  36. [36]  Jones-Walters, L. and Mulder I. (2009), Valuing nature: The economics of biodiversity, Journal of Nature Conservation 17(4), 245- 247.
  37. [37]  Kettunen, M., Vihervaara, P., Kinnunen, S., D'Amato, D., Badura, T., Argimon, M. and ten Brink, P. (2012), Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic Countries. Synthesis in the context of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Nordic Council of Ministers.
  38. [38]  Kriström, B. (1990), Valuing Environmental Benefits Using the Contingent Valuation Method- An Econometric. Analysis, Ume? Economic Studies No. 219. 169 pages.
  39. [39]  Lee, C.K. and Han, S.Y. (2002), Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks' tourism resources using a contingent valuation method, Tourism Management 23, 531-540.
  40. [40]  Maddala, G.S. (1983), Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (No.3): Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pages 149-160.
  41. [41]  Martín-López, B., Montes, C. and Benayas, J. (2007a), The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation, Biological Conservation 139, 67-82.
  42. [42]  Martín-López, B., Montes C. and Benayas, J. (2007b), Influence of user characteristics on valuation of ecosystem services in Doñana Natural Protected Area (south-west Spain), Environmental Conservation 34, 215-224.
  43. [43]  Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Garcia-LLorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I. and Montes, C. (2012), Uncovering Ecosystem services bundles through social preferences, PloS One 7(6), e38970.
  44. [44]  Mattsson, L. and Li C. (1993), The non - timber value of northern Swedish forests: An economic analysis, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8(1-4), 426-434.
  45. [45]  McFarlane, B.L. (2005), Public Perceptions of Risk to Forest Biodiversity, Risk Analysis 25, 543-553.
  46. [46]  Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989), Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method, Resources for the Future: Washington.
  47. [47]  Naughton-Treves, L., Holland, M.B. and Brandon, K. (2005), Role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 219-252.
  48. [48]  Palomo, I., Martín-López, B., Lopez-Santiago, C. and Montes, C. (2011), Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Do?ana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain, Ecology and Society 16(1), 23.
  49. [49]  Pejchar, L. and Money, H. (2009), Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24, 497-504.
  50. [50]  Pettenella, D., Tempesta, T., Thiene, M., Zangirolami, A. and Čulinović, K. (2008), Recreational services economic evaluation and responsible management of protected areas: a case study in the Plitvice National Park (Croatia). In Zadnik-Stirn L. (Eds.) IUFRO International Symposium in Emerging needs of society from forest ecosystems: University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Retrieved on 20/02/2014 from www.iufro.org/download/file/4643/4503/40500-ljubljana08_pdf/.
  51. [51]  Pouta, E., Rekola, M., Kuuluvainen, J., Tahvonen, O. and Li, C.Z. (2000), Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in Finland, Forestry 73(2), 119-128.
  52. [52]  Reyers, B., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Mooney, H.A. and Larigauderie, A. (2012), Finding common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services, BioScience 62, 503-507.
  53. [53]  Reynisdottir, M., Song, H., and Agrusa, J. (2008), Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study, Tourism Management 29(6), 1076-1083.
  54. [54]  Riera, P., Descalzi, C. and Ruiz, A. (1994), El valor de los espacios de interés natural en España. Aplicación de los métodos de la valoración contingente y el coste del viaje (in English: The value of natural areas in Spain. Application of contingent valuation and travel cost methods), Revista Española de Economía 11, 207-230.
  55. [55]  Statistics Sweden (2010), Smaller localities 2010. Retrieved 05/05/2014 from http://scb.se/sv_/Hitta-statistik/Statistik-efteramne/ Miljo/Markanvandning/Smaorter-arealer-befolkning/.
  56. [56]  Söderqvist, T. and Scharin, H. (2000), The regional willingness to pay for a reduced eutrophication in the Stockholm archipelago. Beijer Discussion paper No. 128. 22 pages. Retrieved on 10/02/2014 from http://www.beijer.kva.se/PDF/22897416_artdisc128.pdf.
  57. [57]  Sodhi, NS, Lee, T.M., Sekercioglu, C.H., Webb, E.L., Prawiradilaga, DM, and Ehrlich, P.R. (2009), Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks, Biodiversity Conservation 19(4), 1175-1188.
  58. [58]  Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2004), Protect, preserve, present: a programme for better use and management of protected areas, 2005-2015. Report 5483. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency: Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved on 30/01/2014 from https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/620-5483-X.pdf.
  59. [59]  Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2012), Regulation for Abisko National Park. Extract from Proclamation SNFS 1987:7. Retrieved on 31/01/2014 from http://www.naturvardsverket.se/en/Enjoying-nature/Protected-areas/National- Parks/Abisko/Regulations-for-Abisko-National-Park/.
  60. [60]  Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M. and Chang, A. (2008), An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9457-9464.
  61. [61]  ten Brink, P., Badura, T., Bassi, S., Daly, E., Dickie, I, Ding, H., Gantioler, S., Gerdes, H., Kettunen, M., and Tinch R. (2011), Estimating the Overall Economic Value of the Benefits provided by the Natura 2000 Network. Final Report to the European Commission: DG Environment on Contract ENV.B.2/SER/2008/0038. Institute for European Environmental Policy / GHK / Ecologic, Brussels 2011.
  62. [62]  Tobin, J. (1958), Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables, Econometrica 26, 24-36.
  63. [63]  Tolvanen, A., Forbes, S., Wall, S., Norokorpi, Y. (2005), Recreation at tree line and interactions with other land-use activities. In Wielgolaski F. (Ed.), Karlsson P.S., Neuvonen, A., Thannheiser D. (Ed. Board). 2005. Plant Ecology, Herbivory, and Human Impact in Nordic Mountain Birch Forests. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 203-217.
  64. [64]  Turpie, J.K. (2003), The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: how interest, experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of threat influence local willingness to pay, Ecological Economics 46, 199-216.
  65. [65]  Van Bogaert, R., Haneca, K., Hoogesteger, J., Jonasson, C., De Dapper, M. and Callaghan, T.V. (2011), A century of tree line changes in sub-Arctic Sweden shows local and regional and only a minor influence of 20th century climate warming, Journal of Biogeography 38, 907-921.
  66. [66]  Vierikko K. and Kohl, J. (2009), Improving the ecologically sustainable forest management behaviour - qualitative frame analysis for argumentation, Annals of Forest Research, 52(1) 169-182.
  67. [67]  Viglia, S., Nienartowicz, A., Kunz, M. and Franzese, P.P. (2013), Integrating environmental accounting, life cycle and ecosystem services assessment, Journal of Environmental and Accounting Management 1(4), 307-320.
  68. [68]  Voltaire, L., Pirrone, C. and Bailly, D. (2013), Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach, Ecological Economics 88, 76-85.
  69. [69]  Wall, S. (2003), Tourists' behavior and attitudes in the northern part of the Swedish mountains, Working Paper: European Tourism Research Institute. Retrieved on 15/01/2014 from http://miun.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:30536/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  70. [70]  Wall-Reinius, S. and Bäck, L. (2011), Changes in Visitor Demand: Interyear Comparisons of Swedish Hikers' Characteristics, Preferences and Experiences, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality Tourism 11, 38-53.
  71. [71]  White, P.C.L. and Lovett, J.C. (1999), Public preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moors National Park UK, Journal of Environmental Management 55, 1-13.
  72. [72]  Wittmer, H., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Nessh?ver, C., Bishop, J., ten Brink, P., Gundimeda, H. and Simmons, B. (2010), The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB: TEEB.

Copyright © 2011-2024 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates