[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics
ISSN:2325-6192 (print)
ISSN:2325-6206 (online)
Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management
António Mendes Lopes (editor), Jiazhong Zhang(editor)
António Mendes Lopes (editor)

University of Porto, Portugal

Email: aml@fe.up.pt

Jiazhong Zhang (editor)

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710049, China

Fax: +86 29 82668723 Email: jzzhang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Sustainability Assessment of Certified Tropical Forestry using Emergy Analysis

Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 2(1) (2014) 73--89 | DOI:10.5890/JEAM.2014.03.006

Jose-Luis Izursa$^{1}$; David R. Tilley$^{2}$; Patrick Kangas$^{2}$

$^{1}$ Animal Science/Agricultural Engineering Building, Marine, Estuarine, Environmental Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

$^{2}$ Animal Science/Agricultural Engineering Building, Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

Sustainable forestry production systems, such as certified forestry, re- duced impact logging or sustainable forest management, have become an important part of tropical countries’ strategy to oversee their forest re- sources. Particularly, certification of forest products has become a widely adopted practice as a response to a growing international concern over the ecological and economic sustainability of harvesting natural tropical forests because of the benefits on reducing excessive and unnecessary construction of forest roads, reducing excessive use of heavy machinery, diminishing excessive collateral damage, and improving the inefficient milling processes and wasting of residues. To accomplish the aim of this study, which is to compare conventional and certified forestry we used a systems analysis tool that could integrate various benefits of certified forestry including, stand age, wood harvest, soil losses and economic gain or loss. We found that the affected area under uncertified logging practices is twice the area of certified forestry because conventional prac- tices require more roads, more logging decks and more skid trails. Also, the rate of soil erosion between uncertified logging (154 Mg/ha/yr) and certified logging (66 Mg/ha/yr) is different. Based on these data, we es- timated that the total emergy removed from certified forests was 40% less than the forest under conventional forestry. The fact that certification does a better job of preserving forest while removing wood was also demonstrated through the Environmental Loading Ratio (ELR). We also found that certification leaves forests with a 30% better chance to recover after logging because less wood is removed. But forestry using certifica- tion showed a lower Emergy Yield Ratio (EYR) because the lower yield and the extra cost of certification. Certification is also favored for the higher price for certified wood in international markets. Then, when Bo- livia exports uncertified wood, it obtains a positive benefit, but lower than using uncertified wood domestically (EYR = 20.4). In other words the worst thing the country could do is certify wood for their domestic market and sell uncertified wood abroad.

References

  1. [1]  Auld, G., Gulbrandsen, L.H., and McDermott, C.L. (2008), Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 187-211.
  2. [2]  Baker, P.J. (2003), Tree age estimation for the tropics: A test from the southern appalachians, Ecological Applications, 13(6), 1718- 1732.
  3. [3]  Barry, R.G. and Chorley, R.J. (1992), Atmosphere, weather and climate, London: Routledge.
  4. [4]  Bawa, K.S. and Seidler, R. (1998), Natural forest management and conservation of biodiversity in tropical forests, Conservation Biology, 12(1), 46-55.
  5. [5]  Bennett, E.L. (2001), Timber certification: Where is the voice of the biologist? Conservation Biology, 15(2), 308-310.
  6. [6]  Boltz, F., Holmes, T.P., and Carter, D.R. (2003), Economic and environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-impact logging in tropical South America: a comparative review, Forest Policy and Economics, 5(1), 69-81.
  7. [7]  Brown, M.T. and Ulgiati, S. (2004), Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H.T Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems, Ecological Modelling, 178, 201-213.
  8. [8]  Brown, M.T. and Bardi, E. (2001), Emergy of ecosystems, Handbook of emergy evaluation: Folio #3 (pp. 94): Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida Gainesville.
  9. [9]  Brown, N.R., Noss, R.F., Diamond, D.D., and Myers, M.N. (2001), Conservation biology and forest certification: Working together toward ecological sustainability, Journal of Forestry, 99(8), 18-25.
  10. [10]  Campbell, D.E. (2008), Environmental Research Brief: Emergy and Its Importance. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division Narragansett, RI 02882.
  11. [11]  Castellini, C., Bastianoni, S., Granai, C., Bosco, A.D., and Brunetti, M. (2006), Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(2-4), 343-350.
  12. [12]  Elliot, C. and Donovan, R.Z. (1996), Introduction. In V. Viana, J. Ervin, R. Z. Donovan, C. Elliot & H. Gholz (Eds.), Certification of forest products: Issues and perspectives (pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: Island Press.
  13. [13]  Feldpausch, T.R., Jirka, S., Passos, C.A.M., Jasper, F., and Riha, S.J. (2005), When big trees fall: Damage and carbon export by reduced impact logging in southern Amazonia, Forest Ecology and Management, 219(2-3), 199-215.
  14. [14]  González, Y. and Cruz, M.C. (2004), Estandarización de unidades de medidas y cálculo de volúmenes de madera (pp. 22): Gobierno de Nicaragua, Instituto Nacional Forestal.
  15. [15]  Hanrahan, M. and Grimes, A. (1997, July 15-20, 1997), Análisis de costos-beneficios del manejo forestal tropical certificado y no certificado, Paper presented at the Simposio Internacional sobre Posibilidades de Manejo Forestal Sostenible en América Tropical, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
  16. [16]  Holmes, T.P., Blate, G.M., Zweede, J.C., Pereira, R.Jr., Barreto, P., Boltz, F., and Bauch, R. (2002), Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern Amazon, Forest Ecology and Management, 163, 93-110.
  17. [17]  Holmes, T.P., Blate, G.M., Zweede, J.C., Pereira, R.Jr, Barreto, P., Boltz, F., and Bauch, R. (2000), Financial costs and benefits of reduced-impact logging relative to conventional logging in the eastern Amazon, Final Report. Tropical Forest Foundation, Funda??o Floresta Tropical, USDA Forest Service.
  18. [18]  Hudson, A. and Tilley, D.R. (2014), Assessment of uncertainty in emergy evaluations using Monte Carlo simulations. Ecological Modelling, 271(0), 52-61.
  19. [19]  Ingwersen, W.W. (2010), Uncertainty characterization for emergy values, Ecological Modelling, 221(3), 445-452.
  20. [20]  Izursa, J.L. (2008), An Ecological Perspective of the Energy Basis of Sustainable Bolivian Natural Resources: Forests and Natural Gas. (Ph.D. Marine Estuarine Environmental Sciences), Marine Estuarine Environmental Sciences, United States, MD. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304565689?accountid=27502.
  21. [21]  Jackson, S.M., Fredericksen, T.S., and Malcolm, J.R. (2002), Area disturbed and residual stand damage following logging in a Bolivian tropical forest, Forest Ecology and Management, 166(1-3), 271-283.
  22. [22]  Korning, J. and Balslev, H. (1994), Growth-rates and mortality patterns of tropical lowland tree species and the relating to forest structure in amazonian Ecuador, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 10, 151-166.
  23. [23]  Krueger, W. (2004), Effects of future crop tree flagging and skid trail planning on conventional diameter-limit logging in a Bolivian tropical forest, Forest Ecology and Management, 188(1-3), 381-393.
  24. [24]  Lieberman, D. and Lieberman, M. (1987), Forest tree growth and dynamics at La Selva, Costa Rica (1969-1982), Journal of Tropical Ecology, 3, 347-358.
  25. [25]  Lieberman, D., Lieberman, M., Hartshorn, G., and Peralta, R. (1985), Growth rates and age-size relationships of tropical wet forest trees in Costa Rica, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 1, 97-109.
  26. [26]  Martin, J.F. and Tilley, D.R. (2007), Accounting for environmental sustainability with emergy analysis. In: Encyclopedia of Soil Science (Lal, R. ed.). Taylor & Francis, New York Available at: http://www.informaworld.com/10.1081/E-ESS-120041214.
  27. [27]  Odum, H.T. (2000), Emergy of Global Processes, Handbook of Emergy Evaluation: Folio #2 (pp. 30). University of Florida: Center for Environmental Policy, Environmental Engineering Sciences.
  28. [28]  Odum, H.T. (1996), Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  29. [29]  Odum, H.T. and Arding, J.E. (1991), Emergy Analysis of Shrimp Mariculture in Ecuador (pp. 114), Environmental Engineering Sciences and Center for Wetlands: University of Florida.
  30. [30]  Oliveira, R., Dawson, T., Burgess, S., and Nepstad, D. (2005), Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees, Oecologia, 145(3), 354-363.
  31. [31]  Pearce, D., Putz, F.E. and Vanclay, J.K. (2003), Sustainable forestry in the tropics: panacea or folly? Forest Ecology and Management, 172(2-3), 229-247.
  32. [32]  Putz, F.E. and Romero, C. (2001), Biologists and timber certification, Conservation Biology, 15(2), 313-314.
  33. [33]  Rice, R., Gullison, R., and Reid, J. (1997), Can sustainable management save tropical forests? Scientific American, 276, 34-39.
  34. [34]  Rockwell, C.A., Kainer, K.A., Staudhammer, C.L. and Baraloto, C. (2007), Future crop tree damage in a certified community forest in southwestern Amazonia, Forest Ecology and Management, 242(2-3), 108-118.
  35. [35]  Samad, A.R.A., Othman, M.S.Hj., and Ashhari, Z.M. (2009), Financial and Economic Analyses of Conventional and Reduced Impact Harvesting Systems, Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3), 113-122.
  36. [36]  SENAMHI. (2006), Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrlogía de Bolivia - Datos mensuales de precipitación, Retrieved 12/20, 2006, from http://www.senamhi.gov.bo/meteorologia/climatologia.php
  37. [37]  Sun, G. and McNulty, S.G. (1998, February 16-20), Modeling Soil Erosion and Transport on Forest Landscape,Paper presented at the Winning solutions for risky problems, Reno, NV.
  38. [38]  Tilley, D.R., Agostinho, F., Campbell, E., Ingwersen, W., Lomas, P., Winfrey, B., Zucaro, A., and Zhang, P. (2012), The ISAER transformity database. International Society for Advancement of Emergy Research, Available from: www.emergydatabase.org
  39. [39]  Tilley, D.R. (1999), Emergy basis of forest systems. (Doctor of philosophy Dissertation), University of Florida, Gainsville FL.
  40. [40]  Tilley, D.R. and Swank, W.T. (2003), Emergy-based environmental systems assessment of a multi-purpose temperate mixed-forest watershed of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 213-227.
  41. [41]  UDAPE. (2005), Unidad de Análisis de Políticas Sociales y Económicas - Sector forestal (1990 - 2004) (pp. 50), La Paz.
  42. [42]  Ulgiati, S. and Brown, M.T. (1998), Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems, Ecological Modelling, 108, 23-26.

Copyright © 2011-2024 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates