[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics
ISSN:2164-6457 (print)
ISSN:2164-6473 (online)
Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics
Miguel A. F. Sanjuan (editor), Albert C.J. Luo (editor)
Miguel A. F. Sanjuan (editor)

Department of Physics, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Mostoles, Madrid, Spain

Email: miguel.sanjuan@urjc.es

Albert C.J. Luo (editor)

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Southern Illinois University Ed-wardsville, IL 62026-1805, USA

Fax: +1 618 650 2555 Email: aluo@siue.edu

Dynamical Analysis of Delayed Predator-Prey Models and Explicit Impacts of Harvesting

Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics 13(2) (2024) 373--403 | DOI:10.5890/JAND.2024.06.013

Lakpa Thendup Bhutia, Samir Biswas, Tapan Kumar Kar

Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah-711103, West Bengal, India

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

In theoretical ecology, mathematical models are formulated to understand the interaction among species in an ecosystem. This paper explores the dynamics of three predator-prey models with delay in prey-specific growth rate, predator response function, and predator interaction time respectively. Subsequently, the impact of harvesting is analyzed in all the models. It is observed that varying delay could instigate instability in the system via Hopf-bifurcation. Taking harvesting as control can destroy such oscillatory behavior and bring the system to a stable dynamic. In this interplay between these two parameters, stability switching is observed, and such results could not be ascertained in the latter models. We have also inspected the system's behavior at maximum sustainable yield (MSY). If delay is small, harvesting at MSY could produce stable stock. Various numerical simulations are carried out to visualize our analytical findings.

Acknowledgments

The research work of Lakpa Thendup Bhutia is financially supported by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India (File No. 08/0003(13400)/2022-EMR-I, dated: 4th March 2022) and the research work of Samir Biswas is financially supported by University Grants Commission, India (NTA Ref. No.: 201610175117, dated: 1st April 2021). The research of Tapan Kumar Kar is partially supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India (No. 25(0300)/19/EMR-II, dated: 16th May, 2019). Moreover, the authors are very much grateful to the anonymous reviewers, and the associate editor Jorge Duarte for their constructive comments and useful suggestions to improve the quality and presentation of the manuscript significantly.

References

  1. [1]  Xiao, D., Li, W., and Han, M. (2006), Dynamics in a ratio-dependent predator–prey model with predator harvesting, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 324, 14–29.
  2. [2]  Ji, L. and Wu, C. (2010), Qualitative analysis of a predator–prey model with constant-rate prey harvesting incorporating a constant prey refuge, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 11, 2285–2295.
  3. [3]  Huang, J., Gong, Y., and Ruan, S. (2013), Bifurcation analysis in a predator-prey model with constant-yield predator harvesting, Discrete $\&$ Continuous Dynamical Systems-B, 18(8), 2101-2121.
  4. [4]  Schaefer, M.B. (1954), Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries, Inter-AM Tropical Tuna Commission Bull, 23–56.
  5. [5]  Legovi{c}, T., Klanj{\v{s}}{\v{c}}ek, J., and Ge{\v{c}}ek, S. (2010), Maximum sustainable yield and species extinction in ecosystems, Ecological Modelling, 221, 1569–1574.
  6. [6]  Legovi{c}, T. and Ge{\v{c}}ek, S. (2010), Impact of maximum sustainable yield on independent populations, Ecological Modelling, 221, 2108–2111.
  7. [7]  Legovi{c}, T. and Ge{\v{c}}ek, S. (2012), Impact of maximum sustainable yield on mutualistic communities, Ecological Modelling, 230, 63–72.
  8. [8]  Ge{\v{c}}ek, S. and Legovi{c}, T. (2012), Impact of maximum sustainable yield on competitive community, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 307, 96–103.
  9. [9]  Wangersky, P.J. and Cunningham, W.J. (1957), Time lag in prey-predator population models, Ecology, 38, 136–139.
  10. [10]  Goel, N.S., Maitra, S.C., and Montroll, E.W. (1971), On the Volterra and other nonlinear models of interacting populations, Reviews of Modern Physics, 43, 231-276.
  11. [11]  Nunney, L. (1985), Absolute stability in predator-prey models, Theoretical Population Biology, 28, 209–232.
  12. [12]  May, R.M. (1973), Time-delay versus stability in population models with two and three trophic levels, Ecology, 54, 315–325.
  13. [13]  Beretta, E. and Kuang, Y. (1996), Convergence results in a well-known delayed predator-prey system, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 204, 840–853.
  14. [14]  Beddington, J.R. and May, R.M. (1975), Time delays are not necessarily destabilizing, Mathematical Biosciences, 27, 109–117.
  15. [15]  Freedman, H.L. and Rao, V.S.H. (1983), The trade-off between mutual interference and time lags in predator-prey systems, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 45, 991–1004.
  16. [16]  Ruan, S. (2001), Absolute stability, conditional stability and bifurcation in Kolmogorov-type predator-prey systems with discrete delays, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 59, 159–173.
  17. [17]  Djilali, S. and Bentout, S. (2021), Pattern formations of a delayed diffusive predator–prey model with predator harvesting and prey social behavior, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 44, 9128–9142.
  18. [18]  Aiello, W.G. and Freedman, H.A. (1990), time-delay model of single-species growth with stage structure, Mathematical Biosciences, 101, 139–153.
  19. [19]  Wang, F. and Pang, G. (2009), The global stability of a delayed predator–prey system with two stage structure, Chaos, Solitons $\&$ Fractals, 40, 778–785.
  20. [20]  Rihan, F., Lakshmanan, S., Hashish, A., Rakkiyappan, R., and Ahmed, E. (2015), Fractional-order delayed predator–prey systems with Holling type-II functional response, Nonlinear Dynamics, 80, 777–789.
  21. [21]  Ghanbari, B. and Djilali, S. (2020), Mathematical analysis of a fractional-order predator-prey model with prey social behavior and infection developed in predator population, Chaos, Solitons $\&$ Fractals, 138, 109960.
  22. [22]  Gopalsamy, K. (2013), Stability and Oscillations in Delay Differential Equations of Population Dynamics, Springer Science and Business Media.
  23. [23]  Kuang, Y. (1993), Delay Differential Equations with Applications in Population Dynamics, Academic press.
  24. [24]  Alfred, H., Estomih, S.M., and Oluwole, D.M. (2012), An eco-epidemiological mathematical model with treatment and disease infection in both prey and predator population, Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment, 4, 266–279 .
  25. [25]  Sagamiko, T.D., Shaban, N., Nahonyo, C.L. and Makinde, O.D. (2015), Optimal control of a threatened wildebeest-lion prey-predator system incorporating a constant prey refuge in the Serengeti ecosystem, Applied and Computational Mathematics, 4, 296–312.
  26. [26]  Makinde, O.D. (2007), Solving ratio-dependent predator–prey system with constant effort harvesting using Adomian decomposition method, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186, 17–22.
  27. [27]  Bentout, S., Djilali, S., and Kumar, S. (2021), Mathematical analysis of the influence of prey escaping from prey herd on three species fractional predator-prey interaction model, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 572, 125840.
  28. [28]  Mezouaghi, A., Djilali, S., Bentout, S., and Biroud, K. (2022), Bifurcation analysis of a diffusive predator–prey model with prey social behavior and predator harvesting, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 45, 718–731.
  29. [29]  Souna, F., Djilali, S., and Lakmeche, A. (2021), Spatiotemporal behavior in a predator–prey model with herd behavior and cross-diffusion and fear effect, The European Physical Journal Plus, 136, 1–21.
  30. [30]  Dai, G. and Tang, M. (1998), Coexistence region and global dynamics of a harvested predator-prey system, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 58, 193–210.
  31. [31]  Xia, J., Liu, Z., Yuan, R., and Ruan, S. (2009), The effects of harvesting and time delay on predator-prey systems with Holling type II functional response, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 70, 1178–1200.
  32. [32]  Kar, T.K. and Matsuda, H. (2006), Controllability of a harvested prey-predator system with time delay, Journal of Biological Systems, 14, 243–254.
  33. [33]  Kar, T.K. (2003), Selective harvesting in a prey-predator fishery with time delay, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38, 449–458.
  34. [34]  Misra, A.K. and Dubey, B. (2010), A ratio-dependent predator-prey model with delay and harvesting, Journal of Biological Systems, 18, 437–453.
  35. [35]  Martin, A. and Ruan, S. (2001), Predator-prey models with delay and prey harvesting, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 43, 247–267.
  36. [36]  Kar, T.K. and Pahari, U.K. (2006), Non-selective harvesting in prey–predator models with delay, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 11, 499–509.
  37. [37]  Kar, T.K. and Pahari, U.K. (2007), Modelling and analysis of a prey–predator system with stage-structure and harvesting, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 8, 601–609.
  38. [38]  Meng, X., Huo, H., and Zhang, X. (2012), The effect of Harvesting and time delay on predator-prey system with Beddington-deAngleis type functional response, International Journal of Biomathematics, 5, 1250008.
  39. [39]  Barman, B. and Ghosh, B. (2019), Explicit impacts of harvesting in delayed predator-prey models, Chaos, Solitons $\&$ Fractals, 122, 213–228.
  40. [40]  Barman, B. and Ghosh, B. (2021), Role of time delay and harvesting in some predator–prey communities with different functional responses and intra-species competition, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 1–19.
  41. [41]  Toaha, S. and Hassan, M.A. (2008), Stability analysis of predator-prey population model with time delay and constant rate of harvesting, Punjab University Journal of Mathematics, 40, 37–48.
  42. [42]  Ho, C.P. and Ou, Y.L. (2002), Influence of time delay on local stability for a predator-prey system, Journal of Tunghai Science, 4, 47–62.
  43. [43]  Cooke, K.L. and Grossman, Z. (1982), Discrete delay, distributed delay and stability switches, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 86, 592–627.
  44. [44]  Dubey, B., Kumar, A., and Maiti, A.P. (2019), Global stability and Hopf-bifurcation of prey-predator system with two discrete delays including habitat complexity and prey refuge, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 67, 528–554.
  45. [45]  Kot, M. (2001), Elements of Mathematical Ecology, Cambridge University Press.
  46. [46]  Arditi, R., Abillon, J.-M., and da Silva, J.V. (1977), The effect of a time-delay in a predator-prey model, Mathematical Biosciences, 33, 107–120.
  47. [47]  Gopalsamy, K. (1983), Harmless delays in model systems, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 45, 295–309.
  48. [48]  Cao, Y. and Freedman, H. (1996), Global attractivity in time-delayed predator-prey systems, The ANZIAM Journal, 38, 149–162,

Copyright © 2011-2024 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates