[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Discontinuity, Nonlinearity and Complexity
ISSN:2164-6376 (print)
ISSN:2164-6414 (online)
Discontinuity, Nonlinearity, and Complexity

Dimitry Volchenkov (editor), Dumitru Baleanu (editor)

Dimitry Volchenkov(editor)

Mathematics & Statistics, Texas Tech University, 1108 Memorial Circle, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

Email: dr.volchenkov@gmail.com

Dumitru Baleanu (editor)

Cankaya University, Ankara, Turkey; Institute of Space Sciences, Magurele-Bucharest, Romania

Email: dumitru.baleanu@gmail.com

Dynamics of the Leslie Type Predator-Prey Model with Effect of Fear and Delay in the Prey Population

Discontinuity, Nonlinearity, and Complexity 12(2) (2023) 365--380 | DOI:10.5890/DNC.2023.06.010

$^{1} $ Department of Mathematics, Dr. R. V. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India

$^{2}$ Department of Mathematics, M. Kumarasamy College of Engineering, Karur, Tamilnadu, India

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

We present the dynamics of the predator-prey model of Leslie type by introducing fear and gestation delay in the prey population to get a more realistic model. It is assumed that the predator consumes prey in the form of Beddington DeAngelis functional response. For all positive equilibrium points, the existence and local stability analysis is discussed. The condition for the local stability of coexisting equilibrium point for both delayed and non-delayed model is provided by using the Routh-Hurwitz criterion. The global stability property of the coexisting equilibrium point is analyzed with the help of constructing a suitable Lyapunov function. Also, the model shows bifurcation behavior, particularly Hopf-bifurcation at coexisting equilibrium point for both delayed and non-delayed model are proven analytically. Also, the analytical results are verified numerically in each section.

References

  1. [1]  Lotka, A.J. (1925), Elements of physical biology, Williams and Wilkins.
  2. [2]  Beddington, J.R. (1975), Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, The Journal of Animal Ecology, 331-340.
  3. [3]  DeAngelis, D.L., Goldstein, R.A., and O'Neill, R.V. (1975), A model for tropic interaction, Ecology, 56(4), 881-892.
  4. [4]  Holling, C.S. (1959), The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly, The Canadian Entomologist, 91(5), 293-320.
  5. [5]  Holling, C.S. (1959), Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Canadian Entomologist, 91(7), 385-398.
  6. [6]  Liang, Z. and Honqwei, P. (2007), Qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent Holling-Tanner model, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 334(2), 954-964.
  7. [7]  Crowley, P.H. and Martin, E.K. (1989), Functional responses and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 8(3), 211-221.
  8. [8]  Fan, M. and Kuang, Y. (2004), Dynamics of a nonautonomous predator-prey system with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 295(1), 15-39.
  9. [9]  Sivasamy, R., Vinoth, S., and Sathiyanathan, K. (2018), Exploring the dynamics of three species delayed food chain model with harvesting, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1139, 012028.
  10. [10]  Huang, T. (2004), Uniqueness of limit cycles of the predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 290(1), 113-112.
  11. [11]  Huang, T. (2003), Global analysis of the predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 281(1), 395-401.
  12. [12]  Cantrell, R.S. and Cosner, C. (2001), On the dynamics of predator-prey models with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 257(1), 206-222.
  13. [13]  Sivasamy, R., Sivakumar, M., Sathiyanathan, K., and Balachandran, K. (2019), Dynamics of modified Leslie-Gower harvested predator-prey model with Bedddington-DeAngelis functional response, Discontinuity, Nonlinearity, and Complexity, 8(2), 111-125.
  14. [14]  Murray, J.D. (2003) Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction, volume I, Springer-Verlag.
  15. [15]  Hirsch, M.W., Smale, S., and Devaney, R.L. Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos, Academic press.
  16. [16]  Strogatz, S.H. (2018), Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, CRC Press.
  17. [17]  Mondal, S., Maiti, A., and Samanta, G.P. (2018), Effects of fear and additional food in a delayed predator-prey model, Biophysical Reviews and Letters, 13(4), 157-177.
  18. [18]  Pal, S., Majhi, S., Mandal, S., and Pal, N. (2019), Role of fear in a predator-prey model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Zeitschrift f{\"ur Naturforschung A}, 74(7), 581-595.
  19. [19]  Wang, X. and Zou, X. (2017), Modeling the fear effect in predator-prey interactions with adaptive avoidance of predators, Bulletin of mathematical biology, 79(6), 1325-1359.
  20. [20]  Wu, S. and Meng, X. (2021), Dynamics of a delayed predator-prey system with fear effect, herd behavior and disease in the susceptible prey, AIMS Mathematics, 6(4), 3654-3685.
  21. [21]  Sasmal, S. (2018), Population dynamics with multiple Allee effects induced by fear factors-A mathematical study on prey-predator interactions, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 64, 1-14.
  22. [22]  Liu, S., Beretta, E., and Breda, D. (2010), Predator-prey model of Beddington-DeAngelis type with maturation and gestation delays, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 11(5), 4072-4091.
  23. [23]  Agrawal, R., Jana, D., Upadhyay, R., and Rao, V.S.H. (2017), Complex dynamics of sexually reproductive generalist predator and gestation delay in a food chain model: double Hopf-bifurcation to chaos, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 55(1-2), 513-547.
  24. [24]  Jatav, K.S. and Dhar, J. (2015), Global behavior and Hopf bifurcation of a stage-structured prey-predator model with maturation delay for prey and gestation delay for predator, Journal of Biological Systems, 23(1), 57-77.
  25. [25]  Yang, R., Ren, H., and Cheng, X. (2017), A diffusive predator-prey system with prey refuge and gestation delay, Advances in Difference Equations, 2017(1), 158.
  26. [26]  Vinoth, S., Sivasamy, R., Sathiyanathan, K., Rajchakit, G., Hammachukiattikul, P., Vadivel, R., and Gunasekaran, N. (2021), Dynamical analysis of a delayed food chain model with additive Allee effect, Advances in Difference Equations, 2021, 54.
  27. [27]  Leslie, P.H. and Gower, J.C. (1960), The properties of a stochastic model for the predator-prey type of interaction between two species, Biometrika, 47(3/4), 219-234.
  28. [28]  Vinoth, S., Sivasamy, R., and Sathiyanathan, K. (2020), Qualitative analysis of a modified Leslie-Gower model with addictive allee effect and gestation delay, Discontinuity, Nonlinearity, and Complexity, 9(3), 461-476.
  29. [29]  Shengbin, Y. (2014), Global stability of a modified Leslie-Gower model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Advances in Difference Equations, 2014, 84.
  30. [30]  Kuang, Y. (1990), Global stability of Gause-type predator-prey systems, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 28(4), 463-474.
  31. [31]  Aziz-Alaoui, M. and Okiye, M.D. (2003), Boundedness and global stability for a predator-prey model with modified Leslie-Gower and Holling-type II schemes, Applied Mathematics Letters, 16(7), 1069-1075.
  32. [32]  Chen, S. and Wei, J. (2012), Global stability and Hopf bifurcation in a delayed diffusive Leslie-Gower predator-prey system, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 22(03), 1250061.
  33. [33]  Harrison, G.W. (1979) Global stability of predator-prey interactions, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 8(2), 159-171.

Copyright © 2011-2024 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates