Hamiltonian Perturbation Theory on a Lie Algebra. Application to a non-autonomous Symmetric Top

Subscription Access

Authors

  • Lorenzo Valvo Dipartimeno di Matematica, Author
  • Michel Vittot Aix Marseille Univ, Universite de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5890/DNC.2021.09.001

Abstract

We propose a perturbation algorithm for Hamiltonian systems on a Lie algebra $\mathbb{V}$, so that it can be applied to non-canonical Hamiltonian systems. Given a Hamiltonian system that preserves a subalgebra $\mathbb{B}$ of $\mathbb{V}$, when we add a perturbation the subalgebra $\mathbb{B}$ will no longer be preserved. We show how to transform the perturbed dynamical system to preserve $\mathbb{B}$ up to terms quadratic in the perturbation. We apply this method to study the dynamics of a non-autonomous symmetric Rigid Body. In this example our algebraic transform plays the role of Iterative Lemma in the proof of a KAM-like statement.

References

[1] Arnold, V.I. (1989), Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 2 edn.

[2] Morrison, P.J. (1982), Poisson brackets for fluid and plasmas, Mathematical Methods in Hydrodynamics and Integrability in Dynamical Systems, New York, vol.88, p.36, American Institute of Physics.

[3] Sakurai, J.J. (2017), Modern Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn.

[4] Marsden, J.E., Morrison, P.J., and Weinstein, A.J. (1984), The Hamiltonian structure of the BBGKY hierarchy equations. Marsden, J.E. (ed.), Fluids and plasmas: geometry and dynamics, pp. 115-124, American Mathematical Society.

[5] Marsden, J.E., Montgomery, R., Morrison, P.J., and Thompson, W.B. (1986), Covariant poisson brackets for classical fields, Annals of Physics, 169, 29-47.

[6] Littlejohn, R.G. (1982), Hamiltonian perturbation theory in noncanonical coordinates. { Journal of Mathematical Physics}, 23, 742-747.

[7] Kolmogorov, A.N. (1954), On the preservation of conditionally periodic motions for a small change in {Hamilton}s function, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, SSSR, 98, 527-530.

[8] Arnold, V.I. (1963), Proof of a theorem by {A}. {N}. Kolmogorov on the persistence of quasi- periodic motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian, Russian Mathematical Survey, 18.

[9] Moser, J. (1973), Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Systems: With Special Emphasis on Celestial Mechanics (AM-77), Princeton University Press, rev - revised edn.

[10] Bost, J.B. (1986), Tores invariants des systèmes dynamiques hamiltoniens, Astérisque, vol. 133-134, pp. 113-157.

[11] DeLaLlave, R., González, A., Jorba, A., and Villanueva, J. (2005), KAM theory without action-angle variables, Nonlinearity, 18, 855-895.

[12] Li, Y. and Yi, Y. (2002), Persistence of invariant tori in generalized Hamiltonian systems, Ergod. Th. Dynam. Sys., 22.

[13] Alishah, H. and DeLaLlave, R. (2012) Tracing KAM Tori in Presymplectic Dynamical Systems, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 24, 685-711.

[14] Benettin, G., Galgani, L., Giorgilli, A., and Strelcyn, J.-M. (1984), A proof of {Kolmogorov}s theorem on invariant tori using canonical transformations defined by the Lie method. Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996), 79, 201-223.

[15] DeLaLlave, R. (2001), A tutorial on KAM theory, Smooth ergodic Theory & its applications, Providence, vol.69, pp. 175-292, American Math Society.

[16] Broer, H.W. (2004), KAM theory: The legacy of {Kolmogorov}s 1954 paper. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 41, 507-522.

[17] Féjoz, J. (2016), Introduction to KAM theory with a view to celestial mechanics. Bergounioux, M., Peyré, G., Schnörr, C., Caillau, J.-B., and Haberkorn, T. (eds.), Variational Methods, De Gruyter.

[18] Vittot, M. (2004), Perturbation Theory and Control in Classical or Quantum Mechanics by an Inversion Formula, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 37, 6337-6357, arXiv: math-ph/0303051.

[19] Marsden, J.E. and Ratiu, T.S. (2013), Introduction to mechanics and symmetry: a basic exposition of classical mechanical systems, vol.17. Springer Science & Business Media.

[20] Reed, M. and Simon, B. (1981), Functional Analysis, Volume 1. Academic Press.

[21] Giorgilli, A. (1995), Quantitative Methods in Classical Perturbation Theory, { From Newton to chaos: modern techniques for understanding and coping with chaos in {N}-body dynamical system}, pp. 21-38, Plenum Press, a.e. roy e b.d. steves edn.

[22] Deprit, A. (1967), Free Rotation of a Rigid Body Studied in the Phase Plane, American Journal of Physics, 35, 424-428.

[23] Gurfil, P., Elipe, A., Tangren, W., and Efroimsky, M. (2007), The Serret-Andoyer Formalism in Rigid-Body Dynamics: {I}. Symmetries and Perturbations, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 12, 389-425.

[24] Arnold, V.I. (1963) Small Denominators and problems of stability of motion in Classical and Celestial Mechanics, Russ. Math. Surv., 18, 85.

[25] Pinzari, G. and Chierchia, L. (2010), Properly-degenerate {KAM} theory (following {V}. {I}. {Arnold}). { Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series S}, 3, 545-578.

Article Metrics

Abstract Views19
Citations 1 Crossref
PublishedSeptember 2021

Usage tracked since September 1, 2026.

History Published

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Valvo, L., & Vittot, M. (2021). Hamiltonian Perturbation Theory on a Lie Algebra. Application to a non-autonomous Symmetric Top. Discontinuity, Nonlinearity, and Complexity, 10(3), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.5890/DNC.2021.09.001