Structural Vulnerability and Sectoral Interdependence Embodied in Global Nickel Ore Flows from Source to Sink
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2026.12.001Abstract
Nickel ore has emerged as a strategic mineral for decarbonizing the global economy through transport electrification. However, prevailing assessments overlook intricate interdependencies that underpin global nickel supply chains. Here, we introduce Environmental Extended Input-Output Analysis (EEIOA) to construct a consumption-based framework for tracing nickel flows at regional and sectoral resolution in 2022, and evaluate the supply security via self-sufficiency rates. Our findings reveal a profound geographical asymmetry between extraction and final use, inducing structurally different trade patterns. Physical trade exhibits a concentration and transfers nickel ores from mining areas to manufacturing hubs, while embodied trade demonstrates a decentration pattern. This is driven by the disparity of final use, characterized by a stark contrast between China and Indonesia, the top two users. The final use of China is structurally locked into investment-led demand and dependent on the construction sector, contributing 84.8% of nickel utility in fixed capital formation. Despite domestic extraction, China faces a structural vulnerability with a self-sufficiency rate of only 24.9% due to the greatest domestic demand. Conversely, Indonesia's nickel utility is primarily consumed by households and supported by transportation and public service sectors, with a self-sufficiency rate of 97.9%. These results provide a systemic insight into vulnerabilities of nickel supply chains and an analytical benchmark for fairness and security in resource governance.References
[1] Bevacqua, E., Schleussner, C.-F., and Zscheischler, J. (2025), A year above 1.5 180°C signals that Earth is most probably within the 20-year period that will reach the Paris Agreement limit, Nature Climate Change, 15, 262-265.
[2] Tokimatsu, K., Höhne, N., McLellan, B., and Tunn, M.C. (2017), Energy modeling approach to the global energy-mineral nexus: A first look at metal requirements and the 2 180°C target, Applied Energy, 207, 494-509.
[3] Yang, G., Zha, D., Cao, D., and Zhang, G. (2024), Time for a change: Rethinking the global renewable energy transition from the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Agreement, The Innovation, 5(4), 100582.
[4] Xu, C., Dai, Q., Gaines, L., Hu, M., Tukker, A., and Wang, M. (2020), Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries, Communications Materials, 1, 99.
[5] Shafique, M., Akbar, A., Rafiq, M., Azam, A., and Luo, X. (2022), Global material flow analysis of end-of-life of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide batteries from battery electric vehicles, Waste Management & Research, 41(2), 376-389.
[6] Brand, M., Schuster, S.F., Bach, J., Müller, M., Wilhelm, J., and Jossen, A. (2013), Electrical safety of commercial Li-ion cells based on NMC and NCA technology compared to LFP technology, World Electric Vehicle Journal, 6(3), 572-580.
[7] Sun, J., Zhou, H., and Huang, Z. (2024), The future nickel metal supply for lithium-ion batteries, Green Chemistry, 26, 6926-6943.
[8] Newton, G.N., Johnson, L.R., Walsh, D.A., Hwang, B.J., and Han, H. (2021), Sustainability of battery technologies: Today and tomorrow, ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 9, 7421-7423.
[9] Kim, J., Lee, H., Cha, J., Maki, S.T., and Cho, J. (2018), Prospect and reality of ni-rich cathode for commercialization, Advanced Energy Materials, 8(28), 1702028.
[10] International Energy Agency (2024), Nickel -- Analysis, IEA Reports, https://www.iea.org/reports/nickel-2.
[11] Mudd, G.M. (2010), Global trends and environmental issues in nickel mining: Sulfides versus laterites, Ore Geology Reviews, 38, 9-26.
[12] Wang, X., Wang, A., Zhong, W., Zhu, D., and Wang, C. (2022), Analysis of international nickel flow based on the industrial chain, Resources Policy, 77, 102660.
[13] Wang, X.Q., Wu, T., Zhong, H., and Su, C.W. (2023), Bubble behaviors in nickel price: What roles do geopolitical risk and speculation play?, Resources Policy, 83, 103643.
[14] Guberman, D., Shreiber, S., and Perry, A. (2024), Export restrictions on minerals and metals: Indonesia's export ban of nickel, Office of Economics, U.S. International Trade Commission, 2, 1-32.
[15] Wesselkämper, J., Dahrendorf, L., Mauler, L., Lux, S., and von Delft, S. (2024), A battery value chain independent of primary raw materials: Towards circularity in China, Europe and the US, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 201, 107317.
[16] Graedel, T.E., Harper, E.M., Nassar, N.T., Nuss, P., and Reck, B.K. (2015), Criticality of metals and metalloids, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(14), 4257-4262.
[17] de Koning, A., Kleijn, R., Huppes, G., Sprecher, B., van Engelen, G., and Tukker, A. (2018), Metal supply constraints for a low-carbon economy?, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 202-208.
[18] Watari, T., Nansai, K., and Nakajima, K. (2020), Review of critical metal dynamics to 2050 for 48 elements, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104669.
[19] Deetman, S., Pauliuk, S., Van Vuuren, D.P., Van Der Voet, E., and Tukker, A. (2018), Scenarios for demand growth of metals in electricity generation technologies, cars, and electronic appliances, Environmental Science & Technology, 52(8), 4950-4959.
[20] Han, S., Zhenghao, M., Meilin, L., Xiaohui, Y., and Xiaoxue, W. (2023), Global supply sustainability assessment of critical metals for clean energy technology, Resources Policy, 85, 103859.
[21] Guohua, Y., Elshkaki, A., and Xiao, X. (2021), Dynamic analysis of future nickel demand, supply, and associated materials, energy, water, and carbon emissions in China, Resources Policy, 74, 102371.
[22] Rostami, F., Patrizio, P., Jimenez, L., Pozo, C., and Mac Dowell, N. (2024), Assessing the realism of clean energy projections, Energy & Environmental Science, 17, 3054-3069.
[23] Nakajima, K., Takeda, O., Miki, T., Matsubae, K., and Nagasaka, T. (2018), Global distribution of material consumption: Nickel, copper, and iron, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, 369-374.
[24] Reck, B.K., Müller, D.B., Rostkowski, K., and Graedel, T.E. (2008), Anthropogenic nickel cycle: Insights into use, trade, and recycling, Environmental Science & Technology, 42(9), 3394-3400.
[25] Bartzas, G. and Komnitsas, K. (2015), Life cycle assessment of ferronickel production in Greece, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 105, 113-122.
[26] Yu, Y., Ma, D., and Qian, Y. (2023), A resilience measure for the international nickel trade network, Resources Policy, 86, 104191.
[27] Zheng, S., Zhou, X., Wang, A., Zhong, W., and Wang, C. (2022), Impact of countries' role on trade prices from a nickel chain perspective: Based on complex network and panel regression analysis, Resources Policy, 78, 102872.
[28] Zhou, X., Wang, A., Zhong, W., and Wang, C. (2023), A study on the transmission of trade behavior of global nickel products from the perspective of the industrial chain, Resources Policy, 81, 103376.
[29] Ding, Y. (2020), Study on the evolution characteristics of international nickel ores trade from perspective of complex networks, E3S Web of Conferences, 143, 01014.
[30] Zhou, X., Zheng, S., Wang, A., and Zhong, W. (2022), Risk transmission of trade price fluctuations from a nickel chain perspective: Based on systematic risk entropy and granger causality networks, Entropy, 24(9), 1184.
[31] Bradley, J.E., Northey, S.A., Mudd, G.M., and Werner, T.T. (2025), System dynamics modeling of the global nickel supply system at a mine-level resolution: Toward prospective dynamic criticality and resilience data, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 29, 1-15.
[32] Northey, S.A., Mudd, G.M., and Werner, T.T. (2018), Unresolved complexity in assessments of mineral resource depletion and availability, Natural Resources Research, 27, 241-255.
[33] Sverdrup, H.U., Ragnarsdottir, K.V., and Koca, D. (2017), An assessment of metal supply sustainability as an input to policy: security of supply extraction rates, stocks-in-use, recycling, and risk of scarcity, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 359-370.
[34] Leontief, W. (1970), Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input-output approach, Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 262-271.
[35] Herendeen, R.A. (1978), Input-output techniques and energy cost of commodities, Energy Policy, 6, 162-165.
[36] Bullard, C.W. and Herendeen, R.A. (1975), The energy cost of goods and services, Energy Policy, 3, 268-278.
[37] Wu, X.F. and Chen, G.Q. (2019), Global overview of crude oil use: From source to sink through inter-regional trade, Energy Policy, 128, 476-486.
[38] Kan, S.Y., Chen, B., Wu, X.F., Chen, Z.M., and Chen, G.Q. (2019), Natural gas overview for world economy: From primary supply to final demand via global supply chains, Energy Policy, 124, 215-225.
[39] Wu, X.F. and Chen, G.Q. (2018), Coal use embodied in globalized world economy: From source to sink through supply chain, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 978-993.
[40] Yang, Z.F., Chen, B., and Jia, J.J. (2010), Solar emergy evaluation for Chinese economy, Energy Policy, 38(2), 875-886.
[41] Wu, X.F., Chen, G.Q., and Shao, L. (2015), Renewability and sustainability of biogas system: Cosmic exergy based assessment for a case in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1509-1524.
[42] Wu, X.D., Ji, X., Guo, J.L., Shao, L., and Chen, G.Q. (2019), Global socio-hydrology: An overview of virtual water use by the world economy from source of exploitation to sink of final consumption, Journal of Hydrology, 573, 794-810.
[43] Chen, G.Q. and Wu, X.F. (2017), Energy overview for globalized world economy: Source, supply chain and sink, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 735-749.
[44] Wu, X.F. and Chen, G.Q. (2018), Coal use embodied in globalized world economy: From source to sink through supply chain, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 978-993.
[45] International Resource Panel (2024), Global material flows database, UN IRP Reports, https://www.resourcepanel.org/ global-material-flows-database.
[46] Stadler, K., Wood, R., Bulavskaya, T., Sodersten, C.J., Simas, M., Schmidt, S., Usubiaga, A., Acosta-Fernández, J., Kuenen, J., Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Merciai, S., Schmidt, J.H., Theurl, M.C., Plutzar, C., Kastner, T., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.H., Koning, A., and Tukker, A. (2018), EXIOBASE 3: Developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi-regional input-output tables, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22, 502-515.
Article Metrics
Usage tracking begins September 1, 2026.