Sustainability as a Strategy for the Commons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2019.12.001Abstract
The overexploitation of commons under the purpose of economic growth (i.e. the business-as-usual pattern) is resulting in serious environmental and social damages in many regions around the world. This claim for efforts to better understand the human-nature nexus that would support public policies focused on a real societal development. A sustainable development is mandatory, and for such a goal, higher amount of studies on the most diverse systems and topics are necessary to support better-oriented public policies. This special issue brings research show cases focused on the different aspects under the large umbrella of sustainability concept, including environmental assessments of production systems, natural-social interaction, and the current important theme of happiness. It is expected that the presented studies may collaborate to spread information on the strategy for the commons and, maybe, support further studies regarding such an important topic for a sustainable development.References
[1] Capra, F. (1984), The turning point: science, society, and the rising culture. Bantam Books.
[2] Carson, R. (2002), Silent spring: 40th anniversary edition. Mariner Books, Houghton Mifflin Co.
[3] Dayle, H. and Cobb Jr., J.B. (1994), For the common good: redirecting the economy towards community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon Press.
[4] Diamond, J. (2005), Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Penguin Press.
[5] Ehrlich, P.R. (1995), The population bomb. Buccaneer Books Inc.
[6] Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Mayer, A., Bringezu, S., Moriguchi, Y., Schütz, H., Schandll, H. and Weisz, H. (2011),Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting, Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(6), 855-876.
[7] Hardin, G. (1968), The tragedy of the commons, Science 162, 1243-1248.
[8] IFIAS (1974), Energy Analysis Workshop on Methodology and Conventions. International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Study, Nobel House, Stockholm, Sweden, 89pp. 197.
[9] ISO 14040 (2006), Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneve.
[10] ISO 14044 (2006), Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneve.
[11] Lovelock, J.E. (2000), GAIA: a new look at life on earth. Oxford University Press.
[12] Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. and Behrens III,W.W. (2004), Limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsen Green.
[13] Odum, H.T. (1996), Environmental accounting – emergy and environmental decision making. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
[14] Odum, H.T. and Odum, E.C. (2001), A prosperous way down: principles and policies. University Press of Colorado.
[15] Our Common Future (1987), World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press.
[16] Schumacher, E.F. (1989), Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered. Harper Perennial.
[17] The Earth Charter (2001), Available at http://earthcharter.org, accessed on February 16th, 2019.
[18] UN (2019), Sustainable Development Goals, United Nations. Available at https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ sustainable-development-goals/, accessed on February 18th, 2019.
[19] Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W. (1996), Our ecological footprint – reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada.
Article Metrics
Usage tracking begins September 1, 2026.